Trailer Time: Plausible Deniability

I’m not a fan of theft.  It’s disrespectful.  It’s dishonest.  The violation of copyright undermines the creative works of others.  It erodes the value of intellectual property, which we all rely on to make a living, whether we’re authors, movie makers, or musicians.  So, when I see an author violate others’ copyright in order to “create” a trailer for their book, there’s a part of me that really kind of hopes that karma bites them in the ass.  In short, I’m not overly sympathetic.

This trailer has more wrong with it than violation of copyright, but don’t worry, we’ll get back to that.

We’ll start with the plausibility issue.  This trailer is labeled as a sci-fi trailer.  Science fiction takes at least a little bit of science and extrapolates with “What if..?”  But the best of science fiction attempts to at least justify how it could be possible.

For example, Jurassic Park starts with a mosquito trapped in amber.  A scientific stretch, certainly, but plausible enough to suspend disbelief.  Where is the plausible explanation for bacteroids that can 1) act intelligently, 2) morph an infected being into any creature that ever lived, and 3) decides after a millennia of inaction to go to war against the planet?  Where is the incentive to suspend disbelief, especially considering we’re given nothing to care about, except this shaky premise?

Now, if that wasn’t enough to turn me off—which it is, btw—there’s the fact that this trailer consists of stolen material.  Now, maybe it’s just me.  I’m told that my ethical standards are too high for me to reasonably expect others to live up to them.  Whatever.  The question is how does it make sense for an author who, presumably, expects to make money from a creative work, by convincing other people to buy it, think that it’s okay for them to steal the creative works of others?  If justice were served, people would be stealing portions of this book, claiming it as their own, and trying to profit from the writer’s work.  That would be just desserts, because that’s what the author did to try to promote the book.

So, the first lesson is:  Don’t steal.

The second lesson is:  Explain enough to make it plausible.

The third lesson is:  Seriously, don’t steal!

About Stephanie Allen Crist

Stephanie created and produces in answer to a call from God to use her experiences and gifts to help others. Stephanie is also the author of and two books that can be found on that site. Stephanie strives to share her love, faith, and talents in an inclusive manner to help others who know spiritual pain and who know the bitter taste of the dregs of despair.
This entry was posted in Marketing, Trailer Time and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Trailer Time: Plausible Deniability

  1. acflory says:

    lol – I think this is sci-fantasy. I almost thought I recognized a few shots but my brain wasn’t quick enough to identify. Was one from Walking with Dinosaurs?

    • Maybe. There was a discussion about different scenes on the YouTube feed. I don’t recognize all the clips, but I recognize enough to be confident that they’re probably all clips.

      • acflory says:

        This is a really interesting question and goes to the heart of the copyright laws regarding ‘fair use’. I did a quick search and found this :

        ‘Incorporating small amounts of copyrighted material into a larger presentation is much more likely to be considered fair use than something that makes use of the entire original.’

        So as only snippets of material were used, this trailer may satisfy the ‘fair use’ requirements. However as it is an advertisement for a commercial product, only a court could decide for sure. So better to be safe than sorry.

  2. I suppose it would depend on the court handling the case, but I really doubt it would hold up under “fair use.” The only way it would is if copyright has been sufficiently eroded by the digital age to seriously limit the protections it offers to those of us who create intellectual property. In short, if it is “fair use” we’re doing ourselves more harm than good.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s